data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26a69/26a69bcfc87ed4107888026645d1eabb79c12bd3" alt=""
Bluehat vs Microsoft Sentinel
SIEM Their Way
Generic rules and a closed ecosystem does not build security
SIEM done the Microsoft way where you are locked in to their ecosystem, rely on their ability to maintain scalable, reliable and secure infrastructure does not leave one with a good sense of security.
While initial costs sound cheap, the second you onboard non Microsoft logs be prepared for the price shock!
To put it simply all that glitters is not gold
Traditional SIEM does not scale
Evolving Threats: Outpacing ability to detect effectively
High Cost, Low Return: Expensive & ineffective coverage
Advanced Threats: Threat actors go undetected for longer
Shifting Risks: As you focus in one area your risks increase elsewhere
Soaring Costs: Financial, technology & operational complexity
Talent Gap: Finding and retaining is not feasible
Achieve world class threat coverage
Expand Threat Coverage: Keep pace with the threats as they evolve
Sustainable and Reliable: Goodbye talent gap concerns
Cost Effective: Pay for results from world class detection hunters
Reduced Complexity: Log Collection & Transport the barrier to entry
Move beyond Sentinel with Bluehat Threat Detection Bounty Programs
Let’s catch up
And explore how you can increase security threat coverage while reducing your spend