Bluehat vs Splunk

Splunk is a Ferrari

Everyone wants to own a Ferrari until you realise just how expensive it is.

Like a Ferrari, Splunk is just part of the puzzle of delivering effective cyber threat detection

  1. It is stupidly expensive (licensing costs)

  2. It is expensive to implement and maintain from a platform perspective (human costs)

  3. It is expensive to make the actual data useful (human costs)

  4. It is expensive to perform threat detection coverage (Intel Costs / Ruleset costs / human costs)

    It is no wonder that businesses are left struggling to actually get the value they thought they would when they are struggling to just keep it running and cost effective.

Traditional SIEM does not scale

Evolving Threats: Outpacing ability to detect effectively

High Cost, Low Return: Expensive & ineffective coverage

Advanced Threats: Threat actors go undetected for longer

Shifting Risks: As you focus in one area your risks increase elsewhere 

Soaring Costs: Financial, technology & operational complexity

Talent Gap: Finding and retaining is not feasible

Achieve world class threat coverage

Expand Threat Coverage: Keep pace with the threats as they evolve

Sustainable and Reliable: Goodbye talent gap concerns

Cost Effective: Pay for results from world class detection hunters

Reduced Complexity: Log Collection & Transport the barrier to entry

Move beyond Splunk with Bluehat Threat Detection Bounty Programs

Let’s catch up

And explore how you can increase security threat coverage while reducing your spend